The First speaker said he felt that creative types were optimistic. He asked the question what are the problems we need to solve for a brighter future? He works in advertising and described it as an industry which takes itself seriously and that it tries to take new technnologies and create new ideas.
He suggested that technology had created a lot of problems for advertising. He said that there was nothing wrong with advertising in general, but that it is a parasitical creature which exists around popular contexts and it is a tax on time. He talked about facebook and how it allows users to share data. he said that advertising has to be as good as the content it is trying to attract. He talked about something called the rumpus room and the link between creators and consumers. He suggested that people are into one brand - themselves, this idea of narcissism. He talked about the talk talk x factor adverts and brands celebrating their social spaces and this gardening approach. He came from a programmimg background which he describes as a craft about randomness and chance. He believes that people are waiting for their turn to speak and that the mobile phone is forcing a radical change which comes from existing oppurtunities.
The second speaker was Drew Hemmet, a curator, artist and researcher. He had spent the last 5 years as an art guide for a design lab, priop to this he studied at lancaster university. He talked about the Guternberg press. He doesn't think that we are in a linear history/time. He talked about how revoloution is related to timeand the standardisation of time. Emergance of the industrial revolution based around time. The idea that nothing is ever totally new anymore. Today everything is available. Time is fundamentally different in the way it works today. He talked about Paul Klee's "Angel of History." The idea of the angel looking forward at the wreckage of the future. There is an immense wealth of media and content today.
He talked about the notion of digital public space-about creating new interfaces to culture and knowledge. He asked what would happen if all human culture could be available? What can we design? What can we create?
He talked about a design company called Blast theory - I'd hide you which shows live feeds of video. Another project- chatter - what would happen if private conversations were leaked into a public space. Data visualisation project - where was the public response to a major event. analysed social media - created a real time database. created a data sculpture - permanent record for interesting stories. He suggested that the internet isn't a digital public space because it is made up of private gardens. There are open data cities releasing local government data. There are some positive things emerging for digital culture. Openness can disadvantage the independants- not simply a good thing - many losers.
The smart city - powerhouse big technology companies - we need empowered citizens not smart cities. Sustainable communities - get hub- an open source code depositary. James George - clouds- invented an entirely new art form- how you can create a film in a 3d space. People inventing the tools for which other artists then use. Graphs often used for prediction. Moore's law - curves tend to have an s shape. He ended it with "The future is what we make."
The Third speaker wass Laura Johnson from a company called Bambach. She has a history in design coding / commercial work. Everything I know I learned from the future. We need to step beyond what we are currently doing. Good/Bad what might happen. Ed shaunessy poet- We are the music makers. She said that Ray Bredbury got her excited about the future. We are communication experts. Imagining our future. We spend too long on the stuff thats already going on.google beach in cannes . learning about stuff thats already being digested. Is the world full of cyborgs? Google glass 10,000 people in the world already wearing them. Recording stuff for ourselves. Where will that go? Interesting. What is the nature of reality. Olivier Bell. There is a gadget that changes the frequency of your bodies electrical current - super senses which disney has made. can we put our trust in science. dna is now an open source - can order it online and create your own stuff. there is a genetically altered pigeon that poos soap. what is it to be human? a robotic engineer create a robot called data - how to make robots more human - stand up routine with robot - can read whats funny to make the audience laugh.
We're fucked as an industry busy looking at twitter. We need to change it.
The last speaker was Craig Oldham , a designer who can't code. He raised the question- what type of revolution is the digital revolution? He said that human race is miserable and shit at predicting the future. We can't control the past or future so why fucking worry. The Greeks had the basic model for the future. He talked about Guttenberg printing. He said that the internet whih was invented in 1990 was world changing. We are going so fast so far now. Revolution brings about change. The inevitability of change is compromise . So what has the digital change compromised in us? How we think is compromised. It is easy to be different not that easy to be better. Digital is killing information. Pure Fact. Knowledge is a fundamental understanding of everything from all angles. To forget is human. Everything is permanent now. We keep everything because it is easy. Society glorifies the collective. The internet is a commitee . Populus is a good thing at times . An individuals desire and work ethic pushes something forward. Information is not knowledge. We have eroded ability to edit. This glorifies the collective at the expense of the individual. Empathy and understanding is fundamental for a designer. He thinks that we just keep shit. Believes in people. individuals take you to an important place. Google is the law. Facebook is a glutton . slotted into a customisation. It doesnt make you an innovator just because you use an innovation. chickenonaraft.com pointerpointer.com the uselessweb.com digital revolution needs more thinkers.
As a designer you need to know whats good/bad. Its about doing new stuff, finding the right clients. Make sure you are doing well and have a proper partner ship phone thing makes designers question themselves. value for money. So much brilliant technology gets forgotten about. You need to convince clients to do the right thing. There is an interesting dynamic between new artists and media agents. There are many cases of an artist creating something then it being changed slightly. Design is about doing the right thing and salesmanship. A good idea isnt usually technology led. He talks about collectivism and how there is nothing better than seeing people enjoying your work. We need people that believe in themselves. There has been a big shift into new collaborative ways of thinking. Collaboration is good for somethings but not for others, a genius is someone who sees the potential in other peoples ideas. People think they have a voice because of social networking. We are constantlly under pressure to be controlled. facebook love/hate lack of privacy . We live in an irrational society where ownership and social media is such a powerful tool.
Thursday, 28 March 2013
Tuesday, 26 March 2013
Interview with Jamel Akib
Here is an interview I did via email with illustrator Jamel Akib:
1 .A lot of your work looks hand rendered .Do you
also use digital process to put work together?
I work in chalk pastel for illustration, and in oil for paintings.
Digitally, I take photographs of the artwork and colour correct in photoshop. I
then send a digital version over to the client.
I prefer to work on the easel than digitally, as I seem to have a better
balance to the image. Enlarging a detail and working on it in isolation, just
loses the balance. Nothing beats standing back from the easel to get
perspective.
2.
How long does it
normally take to produce your work?
I’m very quick if working by hand. When working digitally, I tend to
procrastinate . This week I’ve put up an
exhibition on Saturday and Sunday, delivered roughs for a 37 page book on Monday
and completed two editorial illustrations Thursday and Friday. But that is a
particularly busy week. I also taught three classes. How long the artwork takes
depends on the concept. I spent a day on each illustration this week.
But my paintings can take weeks.
3.What are your
plans for future application of your work?
I see illustration playing a much
smaller part. There seems to be a lack of “art” in illustration now. Concepts
and the “what are you trying to say” element in illustration is almost absent
nowadays. My agents seem to be representing either the “kooky” illustrators or
the “ 3 d renderers”. I think if Sue Coe was working in illustration today
she’d struggle to get work!
4.There is varying
opinion about what illustration is ( I read where is the comment, where is the
content in creative review ) What is illustration to you?
Sorry, kind of
preempted this question above. I don’t think illustration is an outlet for
personal expression anymore as what you say is so controlled by art directors
and suits. As a student it seemed to be the most amazing avenue to get your
work seen. I managed to land a cover for the Observer while still at college
and I worked for them every week while a student. So it was the perfect start!
I don’t think it’s so easy now. I compete against illustrators in China for
jobs. I think illustration is now about the “look” of things. You’re very
rarely asked to be inspired by an article and come up with an idea.
5.As an aspiring illustrator, what is the best
advice you could give me?
Depends on your work... animation and the opportunities computers can
offer in this area look interesting. If I enjoyed painting by hand I would look
towards selling through the gallery route.
Image From http://www.saa.co.uk/gallery/artwork/gordon-brown-by-jamel-akib_25111.html
Sunday, 24 March 2013
New project
On Friday we were given a choice of 3 briefs: 8x8-Visualising Fiction, Cheltenham Illustration awards - Mood and Memory and BBC Radio 4 - Comment and Opinion.
Saturday, 16 March 2013
The process - Fairtrade Lino
First I either drew the fairtrade object as its corresponding letter or traced the letter and drew the object inside of it, then I shrunk it down and after traced it in reverse onto the lino. Next I cut each 'letter' out of the lino and then printed them out with black ink. After this I scanned them in onto photoshop and added colour to them, using the fill tool, quick selection tool and magic wand tool. After I finished adding colour to each letter I then put them all together where their corresponding positions would be on the final poster.
Sunday, 10 March 2013
Sunday, 3 March 2013
sketches/possibilties
A is for Accessories
B is for Banana
C is for coffee
D is for Donuts
R is for rice
O is for orange juice
N is for nuts
M is for mango
E is for earrings
- Possibility of making the fairtrade object out of its letter instead of making the letter out of the object
- Could put the letter on the object
- Could decorate the letter with the objects
- Could have characters holding the letters and objects
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)